Suriname vs Tunisia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Suriname
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Tunisia
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Suriname rank
93rd
Tunisia rank
93rd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Suriname
  • Tunisia
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k197019952021

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Suriname ahead.

Suriname ranks 93rd and Tunisia ranks 93rd of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Suriname averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Suriname Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 76.4 current US$ per square kilometre 136.43 current US$ per square kilometre 60.03 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 77.6 current US$ per square kilometre 45.41 current US$ per square kilometre 32.19 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 48.22 current US$ per square kilometre 16.41 current US$ per square kilometre 31.8 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 267.14 current US$ per square kilometre 1,557 current US$ per square kilometre 1,290 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 2,084 current US$ per square kilometre 951.41 current US$ per square kilometre 1,133 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Suriname or Tunisia?
Suriname, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Suriname and Tunisia?
0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Tunisia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Suriname and Tunisia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Suriname ranks 93rd and Tunisia ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Suriname vs Tunisia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/suriname/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/suriname/tunisia/">Suriname vs Tunisia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.