Sri Lanka vs Tunisia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Sri Lanka
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Tunisia
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Sri Lanka rank
93rd
Tunisia rank
93rd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Sri Lanka
  • Tunisia
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k197019952021

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 52 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.

Sri Lanka ranks 93rd and Tunisia ranks 93rd of 216 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sri Lanka Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 136.43 current US$ per square kilometre 136.43 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 0.1353 current US$ per square kilometre 45.41 current US$ per square kilometre 45.28 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 16.41 current US$ per square kilometre 16.41 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 7.12 current US$ per square kilometre 1,557 current US$ per square kilometre 1,550 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 14.88 current US$ per square kilometre 951.41 current US$ per square kilometre 936.53 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Sri Lanka or Tunisia?
Sri Lanka, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Sri Lanka and Tunisia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Sri Lanka ranks 93rd and Tunisia ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sri Lanka vs Tunisia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sri-lanka/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sri-lanka/tunisia/">Sri Lanka vs Tunisia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.