Spain vs United States: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Spain
1,103 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
United States
1,565 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Spain rank
53rd
United States rank
50th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Spain
  • United States
01.0k2.0k3.0k197019952021

How they compare

United States currently reports 1,565 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,103 current US$ per square kilometre in Spain, a difference of 462 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes United States's figure about 1.4 times Spain's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was United States ahead.

Spain ranks 53rd and United States ranks 50th of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Spain averaged higher in 1 and United States in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Spain United States Difference Ahead
1970s 53.3 current US$ per square kilometre 155.39 current US$ per square kilometre 102.08 current US$ per square kilometre United States
1980s 202.2 current US$ per square kilometre 164.35 current US$ per square kilometre 37.85 current US$ per square kilometre Spain
1990s 83.75 current US$ per square kilometre 221.07 current US$ per square kilometre 137.32 current US$ per square kilometre United States
2000s 75.61 current US$ per square kilometre 372.63 current US$ per square kilometre 297.01 current US$ per square kilometre United States
2010s 306.35 current US$ per square kilometre 1,293 current US$ per square kilometre 986.48 current US$ per square kilometre United States
2020s 659.75 current US$ per square kilometre 952.27 current US$ per square kilometre 292.52 current US$ per square kilometre United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Spain or United States?
United States, at 1,565 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,103 current US$ per square kilometre in Spain as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Spain and United States?
462 current US$ per square kilometre, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and United States?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Spain and United States rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Spain ranks 53rd and United States ranks 50th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Spain vs United States: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/spain/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/spain/united-states/">Spain vs United States: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.