Rwanda vs Suriname: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Rwanda
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Suriname
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Rwanda rank
93rd
Suriname rank
93rd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Rwanda
  • Suriname
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k197019952021

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Suriname ahead.

Rwanda ranks 93rd and Suriname ranks 93rd of 216 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Suriname Difference Ahead
1970s 62.92 current US$ per square kilometre 76.4 current US$ per square kilometre 13.48 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 70.24 current US$ per square kilometre 77.6 current US$ per square kilometre 7.37 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 3.88 current US$ per square kilometre 48.22 current US$ per square kilometre 44.34 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 40.93 current US$ per square kilometre 267.14 current US$ per square kilometre 226.21 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 163.6 current US$ per square kilometre 2,084 current US$ per square kilometre 1,921 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Rwanda or Suriname?
Rwanda, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Rwanda and Suriname?
0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Suriname?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Rwanda and Suriname rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Rwanda ranks 93rd and Suriname ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Suriname: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/suriname/">Rwanda vs Suriname: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.