Rwanda vs Solomon Islands: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Rwanda
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Solomon Islands
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Rwanda rank
93rd
Solomon Islands rank
93rd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Rwanda
  • Solomon Islands
05001.0k1.5k197019952021

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 93rd and Solomon Islands ranks 93rd of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 3 and Solomon Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1970s 62.92 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0697 current US$ per square kilometre 62.85 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 70.24 current US$ per square kilometre 4.48 current US$ per square kilometre 65.75 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 3.88 current US$ per square kilometre 25.14 current US$ per square kilometre 21.26 current US$ per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2000s 40.93 current US$ per square kilometre 9.91 current US$ per square kilometre 31.02 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 163.6 current US$ per square kilometre 395.64 current US$ per square kilometre 232.04 current US$ per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2020s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Rwanda or Solomon Islands?
Rwanda, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Solomon Islands as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Rwanda and Solomon Islands?
0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Solomon Islands?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Rwanda and Solomon Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Rwanda ranks 93rd and Solomon Islands ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Solomon Islands: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/solomon-islands/">Rwanda vs Solomon Islands: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.