Peru vs South Africa: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Peru
11,701 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
South Africa
8,991 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Peru rank
7th
South Africa rank
10th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Peru
  • South Africa
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k197019952021

How they compare

Peru currently reports 11,701 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,991 current US$ per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 2,710 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.3 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Peru ahead.

Peru ranks 7th and South Africa ranks 10th of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 3 and South Africa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru South Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 139.22 current US$ per square kilometre 248.1 current US$ per square kilometre 108.88 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 314.09 current US$ per square kilometre 1,704 current US$ per square kilometre 1,390 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 378.55 current US$ per square kilometre 837.64 current US$ per square kilometre 459.09 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 2,793 current US$ per square kilometre 1,426 current US$ per square kilometre 1,366 current US$ per square kilometre Peru
2010s 4,993 current US$ per square kilometre 2,779 current US$ per square kilometre 2,214 current US$ per square kilometre Peru
2020s 7,284 current US$ per square kilometre 5,898 current US$ per square kilometre 1,386 current US$ per square kilometre Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Peru or South Africa?
Peru, at 11,701 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,991 current US$ per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Peru and South Africa?
2,710 current US$ per square kilometre, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Peru ranks 7th and South Africa ranks 10th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Peru vs South Africa: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/peru/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/peru/south-africa/">Peru vs South Africa: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.