Peru vs Philippines: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Peru
11,701 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Philippines
15,450 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Peru rank
7th
Philippines rank
5th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Peru
  • Philippines
05.0k10.0k15.0k197019952021

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 15,450 current US$ per square kilometre against 11,701 current US$ per square kilometre in Peru, a difference of 3,749 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.3 times Peru's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Philippines ahead.

Peru ranks 7th and Philippines ranks 5th of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 3 and Philippines in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru Philippines Difference Ahead
1970s 139.22 current US$ per square kilometre 404.64 current US$ per square kilometre 265.42 current US$ per square kilometre Philippines
1980s 314.09 current US$ per square kilometre 645.4 current US$ per square kilometre 331.31 current US$ per square kilometre Philippines
1990s 378.55 current US$ per square kilometre 258.41 current US$ per square kilometre 120.14 current US$ per square kilometre Peru
2000s 2,793 current US$ per square kilometre 1,749 current US$ per square kilometre 1,043 current US$ per square kilometre Peru
2010s 4,993 current US$ per square kilometre 4,650 current US$ per square kilometre 343.25 current US$ per square kilometre Peru
2020s 7,284 current US$ per square kilometre 9,561 current US$ per square kilometre 2,277 current US$ per square kilometre Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Peru or Philippines?
Philippines, at 15,450 current US$ per square kilometre against 11,701 current US$ per square kilometre in Peru as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Peru and Philippines?
3,749 current US$ per square kilometre, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Philippines?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Peru and Philippines rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Peru ranks 7th and Philippines ranks 5th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Peru vs Philippines: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/peru/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/peru/philippines/">Peru vs Philippines: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.