Papua New Guinea vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Papua New Guinea
5,153 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Zambia
5,719 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Papua New Guinea rank
22nd
Zambia rank
19th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Zambia
02.0k4.0k6.0k197019952021

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 5,719 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,153 current US$ per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 566 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zambia ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 22nd and Zambia ranks 19th of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 289.92 current US$ per square kilometre 340.2 current US$ per square kilometre 50.27 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 679.36 current US$ per square kilometre 182.88 current US$ per square kilometre 496.48 current US$ per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
1990s 528.9 current US$ per square kilometre 38.95 current US$ per square kilometre 489.95 current US$ per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2000s 1,021 current US$ per square kilometre 573.26 current US$ per square kilometre 447.38 current US$ per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2010s 1,350 current US$ per square kilometre 1,287 current US$ per square kilometre 63.08 current US$ per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2020s 3,108 current US$ per square kilometre 3,521 current US$ per square kilometre 413.37 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Papua New Guinea or Zambia?
Zambia, at 5,719 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,153 current US$ per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Papua New Guinea and Zambia?
566 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zambia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Papua New Guinea and Zambia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Papua New Guinea ranks 22nd and Zambia ranks 19th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/zambia/">Papua New Guinea vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.