Pakistan vs Sierra Leone: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Pakistan
99.1 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Sierra Leone
92.35 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Pakistan rank
76th
Sierra Leone rank
77th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Pakistan
  • Sierra Leone
0100200300197019952021

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 99.1 current US$ per square kilometre against 92.35 current US$ per square kilometre in Sierra Leone, a difference of 6.75 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sierra Leone ahead.

Pakistan ranks 76th and Sierra Leone ranks 77th of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 2 and Sierra Leone in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0006 current US$ per square kilometre 32.5 current US$ per square kilometre 32.5 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
1980s 0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre 62.8 current US$ per square kilometre 62.79 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
1990s 0.6073 current US$ per square kilometre 29.08 current US$ per square kilometre 28.47 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
2000s 24.87 current US$ per square kilometre 20.98 current US$ per square kilometre 3.88 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 57.57 current US$ per square kilometre 118.79 current US$ per square kilometre 61.23 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
2020s 71.01 current US$ per square kilometre 47.05 current US$ per square kilometre 23.97 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Pakistan or Sierra Leone?
Pakistan, at 99.1 current US$ per square kilometre against 92.35 current US$ per square kilometre in Sierra Leone as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Pakistan and Sierra Leone?
6.75 current US$ per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Sierra Leone?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Pakistan and Sierra Leone rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Pakistan ranks 76th and Sierra Leone ranks 77th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Sierra Leone: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/sierra-leone/">Pakistan vs Sierra Leone: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.