Oman vs Slovenia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Oman
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Slovenia
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Oman rank
93rd
Slovenia rank
93rd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Oman
  • Slovenia
050100150200197019952021

How they compare

Oman currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Slovenia, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Oman ahead.

Oman ranks 93rd and Slovenia ranks 93rd of 216 countries.

Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oman Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 6.09 current US$ per square kilometre 2.97 current US$ per square kilometre 3.12 current US$ per square kilometre Oman
2000s 2.31 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 2.31 current US$ per square kilometre Oman
2010s 53.68 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 53.68 current US$ per square kilometre Oman
2020s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Oman or Slovenia?
Oman, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Slovenia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Oman and Slovenia?
0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Slovenia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Oman and Slovenia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Oman ranks 93rd and Slovenia ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oman vs Slovenia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oman/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oman/slovenia/">Oman vs Slovenia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.