Norway vs Sri Lanka: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Norway
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Sri Lanka
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Norway rank
93rd
Sri Lanka rank
93rd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Norway
  • Sri Lanka
0255075100125197019952021

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Norway ahead.

Norway ranks 93rd and Sri Lanka ranks 93rd of 216 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 40.3 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 40.3 current US$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 30.24 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1353 current US$ per square kilometre 30.1 current US$ per square kilometre Norway
1990s 22.06 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 22.06 current US$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 8.56 current US$ per square kilometre 7.12 current US$ per square kilometre 1.44 current US$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 48.28 current US$ per square kilometre 14.88 current US$ per square kilometre 33.4 current US$ per square kilometre Norway
2020s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Norway or Sri Lanka?
Norway, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Norway and Sri Lanka?
0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Sri Lanka?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Norway and Sri Lanka rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Norway ranks 93rd and Sri Lanka ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Sri Lanka: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/norway/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/norway/sri-lanka/">Norway vs Sri Lanka: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.