Nigeria vs Uruguay: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Nigeria
31.78 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Uruguay
32.03 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Nigeria rank
83rd
Uruguay rank
82nd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Nigeria
  • Uruguay
050100150200197019952021

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 32.03 current US$ per square kilometre against 31.78 current US$ per square kilometre in Nigeria, a difference of 0.25 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Nigeria ahead.

Nigeria ranks 83rd and Uruguay ranks 82nd of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Nigeria averaged higher in 3 and Uruguay in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nigeria Uruguay Difference Ahead
1970s 7.76 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 7.76 current US$ per square kilometre Nigeria
1980s 2.37 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 2.37 current US$ per square kilometre Nigeria
1990s 0.0091 current US$ per square kilometre 5.73 current US$ per square kilometre 5.72 current US$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 2.26 current US$ per square kilometre 73.53 current US$ per square kilometre 71.27 current US$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 30.22 current US$ per square kilometre 104.77 current US$ per square kilometre 74.55 current US$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 25.85 current US$ per square kilometre 16.01 current US$ per square kilometre 9.84 current US$ per square kilometre Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Nigeria or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 32.03 current US$ per square kilometre against 31.78 current US$ per square kilometre in Nigeria as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Nigeria and Uruguay?
0.25 current US$ per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Uruguay?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Nigeria and Uruguay rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Nigeria ranks 83rd and Uruguay ranks 82nd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nigeria vs Uruguay: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/nigeria/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/nigeria/uruguay/">Nigeria vs Uruguay: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.