Nicaragua vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square
Nicaragua
2,415 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Zimbabwe
2,199 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Nicaragua rank
39th
Zimbabwe rank
41st
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time
- Nicaragua
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 2,415 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,199 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 216 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 39th and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 216 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 27.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 86.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 59.54 current US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 16 current US$ per square kilometre | 132.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 116.31 current US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 6.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 164.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 157.86 current US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 51.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 245.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 193.71 current US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 559.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 668.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 109.06 current US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 1,227 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,565 current US$ per square kilometre | 338.49 current US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Nicaragua or Zimbabwe?
- Nicaragua, at 2,415 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,199 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Nicaragua and Zimbabwe?
- 216 current US$ per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Zimbabwe?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Nicaragua and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
- Nicaragua ranks 39th and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.