Nicaragua vs Tanzania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Nicaragua
2,415 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Tanzania
2,391 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Nicaragua rank
39th
Tanzania rank
40th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Tanzania
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k197019952021

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 2,415 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,391 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, a difference of 24 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Nicaragua ranks 39th and Tanzania ranks 40th of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Tanzania Difference Ahead
1970s 27.4 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0167 current US$ per square kilometre 27.38 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 16 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0963 current US$ per square kilometre 15.91 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1990s 6.24 current US$ per square kilometre 2.64 current US$ per square kilometre 3.6 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 51.68 current US$ per square kilometre 118.32 current US$ per square kilometre 66.64 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2010s 559.76 current US$ per square kilometre 616.78 current US$ per square kilometre 57.02 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2020s 1,227 current US$ per square kilometre 1,517 current US$ per square kilometre 289.78 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Nicaragua or Tanzania?
Nicaragua, at 2,415 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,391 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Nicaragua and Tanzania?
24 current US$ per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Tanzania?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Nicaragua and Tanzania rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Nicaragua ranks 39th and Tanzania ranks 40th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs Tanzania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/tanzania/">Nicaragua vs Tanzania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.