Nepal vs Oman: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Nepal
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Oman
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Nepal rank
93rd
Oman rank
93rd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Nepal
  • Oman
050100150200197019952021

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Oman, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Oman ahead.

Nepal ranks 93rd and Oman ranks 93rd of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 2 and Oman in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Oman Difference Ahead
1970s 21.48 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 21.48 current US$ per square kilometre Nepal
1980s 21.36 current US$ per square kilometre 18.27 current US$ per square kilometre 3.09 current US$ per square kilometre Nepal
1990s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 9.22 current US$ per square kilometre 9.22 current US$ per square kilometre Oman
2000s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 2.31 current US$ per square kilometre 2.31 current US$ per square kilometre Oman
2010s 0.0043 current US$ per square kilometre 53.68 current US$ per square kilometre 53.67 current US$ per square kilometre Oman
2020s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Nepal or Oman?
Nepal, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Oman as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Nepal and Oman?
0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Oman?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Nepal and Oman rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Nepal ranks 93rd and Oman ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Oman: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/nepal/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/nepal/oman/">Nepal vs Oman: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.