Namibia vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Namibia
319.17 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Saudi Arabia
352.52 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Namibia rank
70th
Saudi Arabia rank
69th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Namibia
  • Saudi Arabia
0200400600197019952021

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 352.52 current US$ per square kilometre against 319.17 current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 33.35 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 70th and Saudi Arabia ranks 69th of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 5 and Saudi Arabia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1970s 37.58 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 37.58 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 124.44 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0827 current US$ per square kilometre 124.36 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 21.9 current US$ per square kilometre 5.23 current US$ per square kilometre 16.67 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 80.72 current US$ per square kilometre 14.52 current US$ per square kilometre 66.2 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 124.32 current US$ per square kilometre 76.13 current US$ per square kilometre 48.19 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 203.15 current US$ per square kilometre 233.16 current US$ per square kilometre 30.01 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Namibia or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 352.52 current US$ per square kilometre against 319.17 current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Namibia and Saudi Arabia?
33.35 current US$ per square kilometre, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Saudi Arabia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Namibia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Namibia ranks 70th and Saudi Arabia ranks 69th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/namibia/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/namibia/saudi-arabia/">Namibia vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.