Mozambique vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Mozambique
21.84 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
South Sudan
11.45 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Mozambique rank
85th
South Sudan rank
87th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Mozambique
  • South Sudan
0102030197019952021

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 21.84 current US$ per square kilometre against 11.45 current US$ per square kilometre in South Sudan, a difference of 10.39 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.9 times South Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Mozambique ahead.

Mozambique ranks 85th and South Sudan ranks 87th of 216 countries.

Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 8.06 current US$ per square kilometre 2.1 current US$ per square kilometre 5.96 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
2020s 13.7 current US$ per square kilometre 7.14 current US$ per square kilometre 6.56 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Mozambique or South Sudan?
Mozambique, at 21.84 current US$ per square kilometre against 11.45 current US$ per square kilometre in South Sudan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Mozambique and South Sudan?
10.39 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and South Sudan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.
How do Mozambique and South Sudan rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Mozambique ranks 85th and South Sudan ranks 87th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/south-sudan/">Mozambique vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.