Morocco vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Morocco
388.68 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Namibia
319.17 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Morocco rank
68th
Namibia rank
70th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Morocco
  • Namibia
01.0k2.0k3.0k197019952021

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 388.68 current US$ per square kilometre against 319.17 current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 69.51 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Morocco's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Namibia ahead.

Morocco ranks 68th and Namibia ranks 70th of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 5 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Morocco Namibia Difference Ahead
1970s 45.49 current US$ per square kilometre 37.58 current US$ per square kilometre 7.91 current US$ per square kilometre Morocco
1980s 97.49 current US$ per square kilometre 124.44 current US$ per square kilometre 26.95 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 55.76 current US$ per square kilometre 21.9 current US$ per square kilometre 33.86 current US$ per square kilometre Morocco
2000s 346.43 current US$ per square kilometre 80.72 current US$ per square kilometre 265.71 current US$ per square kilometre Morocco
2010s 814.85 current US$ per square kilometre 124.32 current US$ per square kilometre 690.54 current US$ per square kilometre Morocco
2020s 298.76 current US$ per square kilometre 203.15 current US$ per square kilometre 95.6 current US$ per square kilometre Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Morocco or Namibia?
Morocco, at 388.68 current US$ per square kilometre against 319.17 current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Morocco and Namibia?
69.51 current US$ per square kilometre, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Namibia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Morocco and Namibia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Morocco ranks 68th and Namibia ranks 70th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Morocco vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/morocco/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/morocco/namibia/">Morocco vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.