Mexico vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Mexico
5,390 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Zambia
5,719 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Mexico rank
20th
Zambia rank
19th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Mexico
  • Zambia
02.0k4.0k6.0k197019952021

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 5,719 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,390 current US$ per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 329 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zambia ahead.

Mexico ranks 20th and Zambia ranks 19th of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 74.61 current US$ per square kilometre 340.2 current US$ per square kilometre 265.59 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 256.67 current US$ per square kilometre 182.88 current US$ per square kilometre 73.79 current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 184.64 current US$ per square kilometre 38.95 current US$ per square kilometre 145.69 current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 491.71 current US$ per square kilometre 573.26 current US$ per square kilometre 81.55 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 1,990 current US$ per square kilometre 1,287 current US$ per square kilometre 702.96 current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 3,423 current US$ per square kilometre 3,521 current US$ per square kilometre 97.62 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Mexico or Zambia?
Zambia, at 5,719 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,390 current US$ per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Mexico and Zambia?
329 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Zambia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Mexico and Zambia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Mexico ranks 20th and Zambia ranks 19th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mexico/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mexico/zambia/">Mexico vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.