Mexico vs Papua New Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square
Mexico
5,390 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Papua New Guinea
5,153 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Mexico rank
20th
Papua New Guinea rank
22nd
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time
- Mexico
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 5,390 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,153 current US$ per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 237 current US$ per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 20th and Papua New Guinea ranks 22nd of 216 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 74.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 289.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 215.32 current US$ per square kilometre | Papua New Guinea |
| 1980s | 256.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 679.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 422.69 current US$ per square kilometre | Papua New Guinea |
| 1990s | 184.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 528.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 344.26 current US$ per square kilometre | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | 491.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,021 current US$ per square kilometre | 528.93 current US$ per square kilometre | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 1,990 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,350 current US$ per square kilometre | 639.89 current US$ per square kilometre | Mexico |
| 2020s | 3,423 current US$ per square kilometre | 3,108 current US$ per square kilometre | 315.74 current US$ per square kilometre | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Mexico or Papua New Guinea?
- Mexico, at 5,390 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,153 current US$ per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Mexico and Papua New Guinea?
- 237 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Papua New Guinea?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Mexico and Papua New Guinea rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
- Mexico ranks 20th and Papua New Guinea ranks 22nd of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.