Mauritania vs New Zealand: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square
Mauritania
632.01 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
New Zealand
707.42 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Mauritania rank
62nd
New Zealand rank
61st
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time
- Mauritania
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 707.42 current US$ per square kilometre against 632.01 current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 75.41 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Mauritania ahead.
Mauritania ranks 62nd and New Zealand ranks 61st of 216 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 20.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.36 current US$ per square kilometre | Mauritania |
| 1980s | 25.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 25.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3976 current US$ per square kilometre | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 5.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 55.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 49.91 current US$ per square kilometre | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 148.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 162.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.09 current US$ per square kilometre | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 215.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 460.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 244.68 current US$ per square kilometre | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 326.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 469.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 142.5 current US$ per square kilometre | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Mauritania or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 707.42 current US$ per square kilometre against 632.01 current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Mauritania and New Zealand?
- 75.41 current US$ per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and New Zealand?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Mauritania and New Zealand rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
- Mauritania ranks 62nd and New Zealand ranks 61st of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.