Mali vs Serbia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Mali
1,967 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Serbia
1,714 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Mali rank
44th
Serbia rank
47th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Mali
  • Serbia
05001.0k1.5k2.0k197019952021

How they compare

Mali currently reports 1,967 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,714 current US$ per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 253 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Mali ranks 44th and Serbia ranks 47th of 216 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 238.49 current US$ per square kilometre 401.19 current US$ per square kilometre 162.69 current US$ per square kilometre Serbia
2010s 470.26 current US$ per square kilometre 735.79 current US$ per square kilometre 265.53 current US$ per square kilometre Serbia
2020s 1,362 current US$ per square kilometre 1,062 current US$ per square kilometre 299.63 current US$ per square kilometre Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Mali or Serbia?
Mali, at 1,967 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,714 current US$ per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Mali and Serbia?
253 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Serbia?
16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.
How do Mali and Serbia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Mali ranks 44th and Serbia ranks 47th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs Serbia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mali/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mali/serbia/">Mali vs Serbia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.