South Korea vs Sierra Leone: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

South Korea
69.81 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Sierra Leone
92.35 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
South Korea rank
79th
Sierra Leone rank
77th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • South Korea
  • Sierra Leone
02.0k4.0k6.0k197019952021

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 92.35 current US$ per square kilometre against 69.81 current US$ per square kilometre in South Korea, a difference of 22.54 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.3 times South Korea's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sierra Leone ahead.

South Korea ranks 79th and Sierra Leone ranks 77th of 216 countries.

South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1970s 58.91 current US$ per square kilometre 32.5 current US$ per square kilometre 26.41 current US$ per square kilometre South Korea
1980s 166.83 current US$ per square kilometre 62.8 current US$ per square kilometre 104.04 current US$ per square kilometre South Korea
1990s 244.5 current US$ per square kilometre 29.08 current US$ per square kilometre 215.42 current US$ per square kilometre South Korea
2000s 243.4 current US$ per square kilometre 20.98 current US$ per square kilometre 222.41 current US$ per square kilometre South Korea
2010s 764.62 current US$ per square kilometre 118.79 current US$ per square kilometre 645.83 current US$ per square kilometre South Korea
2020s 2,497 current US$ per square kilometre 47.05 current US$ per square kilometre 2,450 current US$ per square kilometre South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, South Korea or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at 92.35 current US$ per square kilometre against 69.81 current US$ per square kilometre in South Korea as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between South Korea and Sierra Leone?
22.54 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Sierra Leone?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do South Korea and Sierra Leone rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
South Korea ranks 79th and Sierra Leone ranks 77th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Korea vs Sierra Leone: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/korea-rep/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/korea-rep/sierra-leone/">South Korea vs Sierra Leone: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.