North Korea vs Mauritania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

North Korea
515.28 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Mauritania
632.01 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
North Korea rank
64th
Mauritania rank
62nd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • North Korea
  • Mauritania
01.0k2.0k3.0k197019952021

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 632.01 current US$ per square kilometre against 515.28 current US$ per square kilometre in North Korea, a difference of 116.73 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.2 times North Korea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was North Korea ahead.

North Korea ranks 64th and Mauritania ranks 62nd of 216 countries.

North Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Korea Mauritania Difference Ahead
1970s 276.06 current US$ per square kilometre 20.64 current US$ per square kilometre 255.42 current US$ per square kilometre North Korea
1980s 664.18 current US$ per square kilometre 25.26 current US$ per square kilometre 638.92 current US$ per square kilometre North Korea
1990s 390.78 current US$ per square kilometre 5.73 current US$ per square kilometre 385.06 current US$ per square kilometre North Korea
2000s 589.34 current US$ per square kilometre 148.8 current US$ per square kilometre 440.54 current US$ per square kilometre North Korea
2010s 834.15 current US$ per square kilometre 215.4 current US$ per square kilometre 618.74 current US$ per square kilometre North Korea
2020s 335.13 current US$ per square kilometre 326.8 current US$ per square kilometre 8.33 current US$ per square kilometre North Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, North Korea or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 632.01 current US$ per square kilometre against 515.28 current US$ per square kilometre in North Korea as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between North Korea and Mauritania?
116.73 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Korea and Mauritania?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do North Korea and Mauritania rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
North Korea ranks 64th and Mauritania ranks 62nd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Korea vs Mauritania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/korea-dem-people-s-rep/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/korea-dem-people-s-rep/mauritania/">North Korea vs Mauritania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.