Kenya vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Kenya
8.34 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
South Sudan
11.45 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Kenya rank
88th
South Sudan rank
87th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Kenya
  • South Sudan
020406080100197019952021

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 11.45 current US$ per square kilometre against 8.34 current US$ per square kilometre in Kenya, a difference of 3.11 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.4 times Kenya's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Kenya ahead.

Kenya ranks 88th and South Sudan ranks 87th of 216 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 19.33 current US$ per square kilometre 2.1 current US$ per square kilometre 17.23 current US$ per square kilometre Kenya
2020s 5.33 current US$ per square kilometre 7.14 current US$ per square kilometre 1.82 current US$ per square kilometre South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Kenya or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 11.45 current US$ per square kilometre against 8.34 current US$ per square kilometre in Kenya as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Kenya and South Sudan?
3.11 current US$ per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and South Sudan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.
How do Kenya and South Sudan rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Kenya ranks 88th and South Sudan ranks 87th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kenya/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kenya/south-sudan/">Kenya vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.