Kazakhstan vs Papua New Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Kazakhstan
4,167 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Papua New Guinea
5,153 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Kazakhstan rank
24th
Papua New Guinea rank
22nd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Papua New Guinea
02.0k4.0k6.0k197019952021

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 5,153 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,167 current US$ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 986 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 24th and Papua New Guinea ranks 22nd of 216 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 13.81 current US$ per square kilometre 461.56 current US$ per square kilometre 447.75 current US$ per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2000s 310.36 current US$ per square kilometre 1,021 current US$ per square kilometre 710.28 current US$ per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2010s 1,147 current US$ per square kilometre 1,350 current US$ per square kilometre 203.27 current US$ per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2020s 2,937 current US$ per square kilometre 3,108 current US$ per square kilometre 170.79 current US$ per square kilometre Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Kazakhstan or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 5,153 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,167 current US$ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Kazakhstan and Papua New Guinea?
986 current US$ per square kilometre, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Papua New Guinea?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Kazakhstan and Papua New Guinea rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Kazakhstan ranks 24th and Papua New Guinea ranks 22nd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Papua New Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/papua-new-guinea/">Kazakhstan vs Papua New Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.