Hong Kong vs Slovenia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square
Hong Kong
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Slovenia
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Hong Kong rank
93rd
Slovenia rank
93rd
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time
- Hong Kong
- Slovenia
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Slovenia, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 93rd and Slovenia ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.97 current US$ per square kilometre | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2010s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Hong Kong or Slovenia?
- Hong Kong, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Slovenia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Hong Kong and Slovenia?
- 0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Slovenia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
- How do Hong Kong and Slovenia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
- Hong Kong ranks 93rd and Slovenia ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.