Hong Kong vs Malawi: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Hong Kong
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Malawi
0.6193 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Hong Kong rank
93rd
Malawi rank
92nd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Malawi
010203040197019952021

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.6193 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.6193 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 93rd and Malawi ranks 92nd of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Malawi Difference Ahead
1970s 16.86 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 16.86 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
1980s 7.66 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 7.66 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
1990s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —
2000s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —
2010s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5055 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5055 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Hong Kong or Malawi?
Malawi, at 0.6193 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Hong Kong and Malawi?
0.6193 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Malawi?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Hong Kong and Malawi rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Hong Kong ranks 93rd and Malawi ranks 92nd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Malawi: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/malawi/">Hong Kong vs Malawi: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.