Honduras vs New Zealand: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Honduras
754.94 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
New Zealand
707.42 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Honduras rank
59th
New Zealand rank
61st

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Honduras
  • New Zealand
0200400600800197019952021

How they compare

Honduras currently reports 754.94 current US$ per square kilometre against 707.42 current US$ per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 47.52 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Honduras's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Honduras ahead.

Honduras ranks 59th and New Zealand ranks 61st of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 66.97 current US$ per square kilometre 8.28 current US$ per square kilometre 58.69 current US$ per square kilometre Honduras
1980s 204.37 current US$ per square kilometre 25.66 current US$ per square kilometre 178.71 current US$ per square kilometre Honduras
1990s 25.11 current US$ per square kilometre 55.64 current US$ per square kilometre 30.53 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 131.56 current US$ per square kilometre 162.89 current US$ per square kilometre 31.33 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 235.42 current US$ per square kilometre 460.08 current US$ per square kilometre 224.66 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 378.06 current US$ per square kilometre 469.31 current US$ per square kilometre 91.24 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Honduras or New Zealand?
Honduras, at 754.94 current US$ per square kilometre against 707.42 current US$ per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Honduras and New Zealand?
47.52 current US$ per square kilometre, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and New Zealand?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Honduras and New Zealand rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Honduras ranks 59th and New Zealand ranks 61st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Honduras vs New Zealand: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/honduras/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/honduras/new-zealand/">Honduras vs New Zealand: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.