Guyana vs Tanzania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Guyana
2,769 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Tanzania
2,391 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Guyana rank
37th
Tanzania rank
40th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Guyana
  • Tanzania
01.0k2.0k3.0k197019952021

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 2,769 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,391 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, a difference of 378 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guyana's figure about 1.2 times Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Guyana ahead.

Guyana ranks 37th and Tanzania ranks 40th of 216 countries.

Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana Tanzania Difference Ahead
1970s 18.14 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0167 current US$ per square kilometre 18.12 current US$ per square kilometre Guyana
1980s 19.5 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0963 current US$ per square kilometre 19.4 current US$ per square kilometre Guyana
1990s 102.53 current US$ per square kilometre 2.64 current US$ per square kilometre 99.88 current US$ per square kilometre Guyana
2000s 240.59 current US$ per square kilometre 118.32 current US$ per square kilometre 122.27 current US$ per square kilometre Guyana
2010s 972.14 current US$ per square kilometre 616.78 current US$ per square kilometre 355.36 current US$ per square kilometre Guyana
2020s 1,639 current US$ per square kilometre 1,517 current US$ per square kilometre 121.73 current US$ per square kilometre Guyana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Guyana or Tanzania?
Guyana, at 2,769 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,391 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Guyana and Tanzania?
378 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Tanzania?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Guyana and Tanzania rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Guyana ranks 37th and Tanzania ranks 40th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guyana vs Tanzania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guyana/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guyana/tanzania/">Guyana vs Tanzania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.