Guinea vs Norway: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Guinea
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Norway
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Guinea rank
93rd
Norway rank
93rd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Guinea
  • Norway
02505007501.0k1.2k197019952021

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Norway ahead.

Guinea ranks 93rd and Norway ranks 93rd of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 4 and Norway in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Norway Difference Ahead
1970s 38.75 current US$ per square kilometre 40.3 current US$ per square kilometre 1.55 current US$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 95.54 current US$ per square kilometre 30.24 current US$ per square kilometre 65.3 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea
1990s 92.72 current US$ per square kilometre 22.06 current US$ per square kilometre 70.66 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea
2000s 212.02 current US$ per square kilometre 8.56 current US$ per square kilometre 203.46 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea
2010s 697.91 current US$ per square kilometre 48.28 current US$ per square kilometre 649.63 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea
2020s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Guinea or Norway?
Guinea, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Norway as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Guinea and Norway?
0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Norway?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Guinea and Norway rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Guinea ranks 93rd and Norway ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Norway: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea/norway/">Guinea vs Norway: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.