Guatemala vs Kazakhstan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Guatemala
4,215 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Kazakhstan
4,167 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Guatemala rank
23rd
Kazakhstan rank
24th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Guatemala
  • Kazakhstan
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k197019952021

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 4,215 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,167 current US$ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 48 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Guatemala ranks 23rd and Kazakhstan ranks 24th of 216 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 6.01 current US$ per square kilometre 13.81 current US$ per square kilometre 7.8 current US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2000s 374.43 current US$ per square kilometre 310.36 current US$ per square kilometre 64.07 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 2,030 current US$ per square kilometre 1,147 current US$ per square kilometre 883.38 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 2,817 current US$ per square kilometre 2,937 current US$ per square kilometre 120.28 current US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Guatemala or Kazakhstan?
Guatemala, at 4,215 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,167 current US$ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Guatemala and Kazakhstan?
48 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Kazakhstan?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Guatemala and Kazakhstan rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Guatemala ranks 23rd and Kazakhstan ranks 24th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Kazakhstan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/kazakhstan/">Guatemala vs Kazakhstan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.