Germany vs Suriname: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Germany
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Suriname
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Germany rank
93rd
Suriname rank
93rd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Germany
  • Suriname
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k197019952021

How they compare

Germany currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Suriname ahead.

Germany ranks 93rd and Suriname ranks 93rd of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Suriname Difference Ahead
1970s 52.1 current US$ per square kilometre 76.4 current US$ per square kilometre 24.3 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 38.19 current US$ per square kilometre 77.6 current US$ per square kilometre 39.42 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 3.58 current US$ per square kilometre 48.22 current US$ per square kilometre 44.64 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 3.41 current US$ per square kilometre 267.14 current US$ per square kilometre 263.73 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 330.55 current US$ per square kilometre 2,084 current US$ per square kilometre 1,754 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 1,695 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 1,695 current US$ per square kilometre Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Germany or Suriname?
Germany, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Germany and Suriname?
0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Suriname?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Germany and Suriname rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Germany ranks 93rd and Suriname ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Suriname: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/germany/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/germany/suriname/">Germany vs Suriname: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.