Georgia vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Georgia
2,655 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Zimbabwe
2,199 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Georgia rank
38th
Zimbabwe rank
41st

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Georgia
  • Zimbabwe
01.0k2.0k3.0k197019952021

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 2,655 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,199 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 456 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Georgia ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 216 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 32.1 current US$ per square kilometre 160.5 current US$ per square kilometre 128.41 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 250.83 current US$ per square kilometre 245.39 current US$ per square kilometre 5.44 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 1,071 current US$ per square kilometre 668.82 current US$ per square kilometre 402.08 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2020s 2,019 current US$ per square kilometre 1,565 current US$ per square kilometre 453.43 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Georgia or Zimbabwe?
Georgia, at 2,655 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,199 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Georgia and Zimbabwe?
456 current US$ per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Zimbabwe?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Georgia and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Georgia ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/georgia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/georgia/zimbabwe/">Georgia vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.