Georgia vs Tanzania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square
Georgia
2,655 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Tanzania
2,391 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Georgia rank
38th
Tanzania rank
40th
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time
- Georgia
- Tanzania
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 2,655 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,391 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, a difference of 264 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 38th and Tanzania ranks 40th of 216 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 32.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 29.34 current US$ per square kilometre | Georgia |
| 2000s | 250.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 118.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 132.51 current US$ per square kilometre | Georgia |
| 2010s | 1,071 current US$ per square kilometre | 616.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 454.12 current US$ per square kilometre | Georgia |
| 2020s | 2,019 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,517 current US$ per square kilometre | 502.15 current US$ per square kilometre | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Georgia or Tanzania?
- Georgia, at 2,655 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,391 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Georgia and Tanzania?
- 264 current US$ per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Tanzania?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and Tanzania rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
- Georgia ranks 38th and Tanzania ranks 40th of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.