Fiji vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Fiji
2,052 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Zimbabwe
2,199 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Fiji rank
42nd
Zimbabwe rank
41st

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Fiji
  • Zimbabwe
05001.0k1.5k2.0k197019952021

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 2,199 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,052 current US$ per square kilometre in Fiji, a difference of 147 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Fiji's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Fiji ranks 42nd and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Fiji Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 24.32 current US$ per square kilometre 86.94 current US$ per square kilometre 62.62 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 214.91 current US$ per square kilometre 132.32 current US$ per square kilometre 82.59 current US$ per square kilometre Fiji
1990s 290.67 current US$ per square kilometre 164.1 current US$ per square kilometre 126.56 current US$ per square kilometre Fiji
2000s 439.91 current US$ per square kilometre 245.39 current US$ per square kilometre 194.52 current US$ per square kilometre Fiji
2010s 946.07 current US$ per square kilometre 668.82 current US$ per square kilometre 277.25 current US$ per square kilometre Fiji
2020s 1,460 current US$ per square kilometre 1,565 current US$ per square kilometre 105.61 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Fiji or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 2,199 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,052 current US$ per square kilometre in Fiji as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Fiji and Zimbabwe?
147 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Zimbabwe?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Fiji and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Fiji ranks 42nd and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Fiji vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/fiji/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/fiji/zimbabwe/">Fiji vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.