Fiji vs Tanzania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Fiji
2,052 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Tanzania
2,391 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Fiji rank
42nd
Tanzania rank
40th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Fiji
  • Tanzania
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k197019952021

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 2,391 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,052 current US$ per square kilometre in Fiji, a difference of 339 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.2 times Fiji's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Tanzania ahead.

Fiji ranks 42nd and Tanzania ranks 40th of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 5 and Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Fiji Tanzania Difference Ahead
1970s 24.32 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0167 current US$ per square kilometre 24.3 current US$ per square kilometre Fiji
1980s 214.91 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0963 current US$ per square kilometre 214.81 current US$ per square kilometre Fiji
1990s 290.67 current US$ per square kilometre 2.64 current US$ per square kilometre 288.03 current US$ per square kilometre Fiji
2000s 439.91 current US$ per square kilometre 118.32 current US$ per square kilometre 321.59 current US$ per square kilometre Fiji
2010s 946.07 current US$ per square kilometre 616.78 current US$ per square kilometre 329.29 current US$ per square kilometre Fiji
2020s 1,460 current US$ per square kilometre 1,517 current US$ per square kilometre 56.89 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Fiji or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 2,391 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,052 current US$ per square kilometre in Fiji as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Fiji and Tanzania?
339 current US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Tanzania?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Fiji and Tanzania rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Fiji ranks 42nd and Tanzania ranks 40th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Fiji vs Tanzania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/fiji/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/fiji/tanzania/">Fiji vs Tanzania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.