Ethiopia vs Romania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Ethiopia
202.19 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Romania
195.44 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Ethiopia rank
73rd
Romania rank
74th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Romania
0100200300197019952021

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 202.19 current US$ per square kilometre against 195.44 current US$ per square kilometre in Romania, a difference of 6.75 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Romania ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 73rd and Romania ranks 74th of 216 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Romania Difference Ahead
1990s 4.91 current US$ per square kilometre 82.97 current US$ per square kilometre 78.06 current US$ per square kilometre Romania
2000s 11.36 current US$ per square kilometre 58.19 current US$ per square kilometre 46.83 current US$ per square kilometre Romania
2010s 77.87 current US$ per square kilometre 102.85 current US$ per square kilometre 24.98 current US$ per square kilometre Romania
2020s 130.88 current US$ per square kilometre 132.86 current US$ per square kilometre 1.97 current US$ per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Ethiopia or Romania?
Ethiopia, at 202.19 current US$ per square kilometre against 195.44 current US$ per square kilometre in Romania as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Ethiopia and Romania?
6.75 current US$ per square kilometre, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Romania?
29 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2021.
How do Ethiopia and Romania rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Ethiopia ranks 73rd and Romania ranks 74th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Romania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ethiopia/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ethiopia/romania/">Ethiopia vs Romania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.