Ethiopia vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Ethiopia
202.19 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Namibia
319.17 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Ethiopia rank
73rd
Namibia rank
70th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Namibia
0200400600197019952021

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 319.17 current US$ per square kilometre against 202.19 current US$ per square kilometre in Ethiopia, a difference of 116.98 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.6 times Ethiopia's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Namibia ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 73rd and Namibia ranks 70th of 216 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 4.91 current US$ per square kilometre 6.92 current US$ per square kilometre 2.01 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 11.36 current US$ per square kilometre 80.72 current US$ per square kilometre 69.36 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 77.87 current US$ per square kilometre 124.32 current US$ per square kilometre 46.45 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 130.88 current US$ per square kilometre 203.15 current US$ per square kilometre 72.27 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Ethiopia or Namibia?
Namibia, at 319.17 current US$ per square kilometre against 202.19 current US$ per square kilometre in Ethiopia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Ethiopia and Namibia?
116.98 current US$ per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Namibia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2021.
How do Ethiopia and Namibia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Ethiopia ranks 73rd and Namibia ranks 70th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ethiopia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ethiopia/namibia/">Ethiopia vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.