Eswatini vs Hong Kong: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Eswatini
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Hong Kong
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Eswatini rank
93rd
Hong Kong rank
93rd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Eswatini
  • Hong Kong
0200400600800197019952021

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 93rd and Hong Kong ranks 93rd of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Hong Kong in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Hong Kong Difference Ahead
1970s 74.14 current US$ per square kilometre 16.86 current US$ per square kilometre 57.28 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 7.66 current US$ per square kilometre 7.66 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
1990s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —
2000s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —
2010s 171.06 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 171.06 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Eswatini or Hong Kong?
Eswatini, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Eswatini and Hong Kong?
0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Hong Kong?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Eswatini and Hong Kong rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Eswatini ranks 93rd and Hong Kong ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Hong Kong: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/hong-kong-sar-china/">Eswatini vs Hong Kong: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.