Eritrea vs Senegal: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Eritrea
3,355 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Senegal
3,220 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Eritrea rank
32nd
Senegal rank
33rd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Eritrea
  • Senegal
01.0k2.0k3.0k197019952021

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 3,355 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,220 current US$ per square kilometre in Senegal, a difference of 135 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Senegal ahead.

Eritrea ranks 32nd and Senegal ranks 33rd of 216 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Senegal in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Senegal Difference Ahead
1990s 4.15 current US$ per square kilometre 1.64 current US$ per square kilometre 2.51 current US$ per square kilometre Eritrea
2000s 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre 69.98 current US$ per square kilometre 68.87 current US$ per square kilometre Senegal
2010s 1,015 current US$ per square kilometre 725.17 current US$ per square kilometre 289.34 current US$ per square kilometre Eritrea
2020s 1,826 current US$ per square kilometre 2,206 current US$ per square kilometre 379.37 current US$ per square kilometre Senegal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Eritrea or Senegal?
Eritrea, at 3,355 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,220 current US$ per square kilometre in Senegal as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Eritrea and Senegal?
135 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Senegal?
29 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2021.
How do Eritrea and Senegal rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Eritrea ranks 32nd and Senegal ranks 33rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Senegal: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/senegal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/senegal/">Eritrea vs Senegal: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.