Eritrea vs Portugal: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Eritrea
3,355 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Portugal
3,185 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Eritrea rank
32nd
Portugal rank
34th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Eritrea
  • Portugal
01.0k2.0k3.0k197019952021

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 3,355 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,185 current US$ per square kilometre in Portugal, a difference of 170 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Portugal's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Portugal ahead.

Eritrea ranks 32nd and Portugal ranks 34th of 216 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Portugal Difference Ahead
1990s 4.15 current US$ per square kilometre 373.35 current US$ per square kilometre 369.2 current US$ per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre 772.24 current US$ per square kilometre 771.13 current US$ per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 1,015 current US$ per square kilometre 654.01 current US$ per square kilometre 360.51 current US$ per square kilometre Eritrea
2020s 1,826 current US$ per square kilometre 2,352 current US$ per square kilometre 525.94 current US$ per square kilometre Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Eritrea or Portugal?
Eritrea, at 3,355 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,185 current US$ per square kilometre in Portugal as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Eritrea and Portugal?
170 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Portugal?
29 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2021.
How do Eritrea and Portugal rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Eritrea ranks 32nd and Portugal ranks 34th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Portugal: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/portugal/">Eritrea vs Portugal: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.