Eritrea vs Poland: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Eritrea
3,355 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Poland
3,699 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Eritrea rank
32nd
Poland rank
29th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Eritrea
  • Poland
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k197019952021

How they compare

Poland currently reports 3,699 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,355 current US$ per square kilometre in Eritrea, a difference of 344 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Eritrea ranks 32nd and Poland ranks 29th of 216 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Poland Difference Ahead
1990s 4.15 current US$ per square kilometre 339.59 current US$ per square kilometre 335.44 current US$ per square kilometre Poland
2000s 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre 1,228 current US$ per square kilometre 1,227 current US$ per square kilometre Poland
2010s 1,015 current US$ per square kilometre 5,525 current US$ per square kilometre 4,511 current US$ per square kilometre Poland
2020s 1,826 current US$ per square kilometre 2,412 current US$ per square kilometre 585.61 current US$ per square kilometre Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Eritrea or Poland?
Poland, at 3,699 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,355 current US$ per square kilometre in Eritrea as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Eritrea and Poland?
344 current US$ per square kilometre, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Poland?
29 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2021.
How do Eritrea and Poland rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Eritrea ranks 32nd and Poland ranks 29th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Poland: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/poland/">Eritrea vs Poland: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.