Equatorial Guinea vs Solomon Islands: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square
Equatorial Guinea
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Solomon Islands
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Equatorial Guinea rank
93rd
Solomon Islands rank
93rd
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 93rd and Solomon Islands ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Solomon Islands in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0697 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0697 current US$ per square kilometre | Solomon Islands |
| 1980s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.48 current US$ per square kilometre | Solomon Islands |
| 1990s | 4.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 25.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.01 current US$ per square kilometre | Solomon Islands |
| 2000s | 27.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.54 current US$ per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 41.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 395.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 354.54 current US$ per square kilometre | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Equatorial Guinea or Solomon Islands?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Solomon Islands as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Equatorial Guinea and Solomon Islands?
- 0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Solomon Islands?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Solomon Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 93rd and Solomon Islands ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.