Equatorial Guinea vs Norway: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square
Equatorial Guinea
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Norway
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Equatorial Guinea rank
93rd
Norway rank
93rd
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Norway
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Norway ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 93rd and Norway ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 40.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 40.3 current US$ per square kilometre | Norway |
| 1980s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 30.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 30.24 current US$ per square kilometre | Norway |
| 1990s | 4.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 22.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.93 current US$ per square kilometre | Norway |
| 2000s | 27.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 18.89 current US$ per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 41.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 48.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.17 current US$ per square kilometre | Norway |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Equatorial Guinea or Norway?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Norway as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Equatorial Guinea and Norway?
- 0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Norway?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Norway rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 93rd and Norway ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.