Ecuador vs Netherlands: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Ecuador
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Netherlands
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Ecuador rank
93rd
Netherlands rank
93rd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Ecuador
  • Netherlands
0200400600197019952021

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Netherlands, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 93rd and Netherlands ranks 93rd of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 4 and Netherlands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Netherlands Difference Ahead
1970s 0.5897 current US$ per square kilometre 83.83 current US$ per square kilometre 83.24 current US$ per square kilometre Netherlands
1980s 13.31 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 13.31 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 30.97 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 30.97 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 92.63 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 92.63 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 275.08 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 275.08 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Ecuador or Netherlands?
Ecuador, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Netherlands as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Ecuador and Netherlands?
0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Netherlands?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Ecuador and Netherlands rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Ecuador ranks 93rd and Netherlands ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Netherlands: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/netherlands/">Ecuador vs Netherlands: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.