Denmark vs Equatorial Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square
Denmark
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Equatorial Guinea
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Denmark rank
93rd
Equatorial Guinea rank
93rd
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time
- Denmark
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Denmark ahead.
Denmark ranks 93rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 4 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | Denmark |
| 1980s | 46.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 46.95 current US$ per square kilometre | Denmark |
| 1990s | 16.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.24 current US$ per square kilometre | Denmark |
| 2000s | 123.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 95.68 current US$ per square kilometre | Denmark |
| 2010s | 27.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 41.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.64 current US$ per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Denmark or Equatorial Guinea?
- Denmark, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Denmark and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Equatorial Guinea?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Denmark and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
- Denmark ranks 93rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.