Czechia vs Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Czechia
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Guinea
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Czechia rank
93rd
Guinea rank
93rd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Czechia
  • Guinea
02505007501.0k1.2k197019952021

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Guinea, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Guinea has been ahead every year.

Czechia ranks 93rd and Guinea ranks 93rd of 216 countries.

Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 13.61 current US$ per square kilometre 87.27 current US$ per square kilometre 73.67 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea
2000s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 212.02 current US$ per square kilometre 212.02 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea
2010s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 697.91 current US$ per square kilometre 697.91 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea
2020s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Czechia or Guinea?
Czechia, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Guinea as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Czechia and Guinea?
0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Guinea?
29 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2021.
How do Czechia and Guinea rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Czechia ranks 93rd and Guinea ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/guinea/">Czechia vs Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.