Cyprus vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Cyprus
283.96 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Namibia
319.17 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Cyprus rank
71st
Namibia rank
70th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Cyprus
  • Namibia
02505007501.0k197019952021

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 319.17 current US$ per square kilometre against 283.96 current US$ per square kilometre in Cyprus, a difference of 35.21 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Cyprus's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cyprus ahead.

Cyprus ranks 71st and Namibia ranks 70th of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Namibia Difference Ahead
1970s 585.26 current US$ per square kilometre 37.58 current US$ per square kilometre 547.67 current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus
1980s 31.43 current US$ per square kilometre 124.44 current US$ per square kilometre 93.01 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 31.51 current US$ per square kilometre 21.9 current US$ per square kilometre 9.61 current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus
2000s 73.18 current US$ per square kilometre 80.72 current US$ per square kilometre 7.54 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 357.24 current US$ per square kilometre 124.32 current US$ per square kilometre 232.92 current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus
2020s 213.12 current US$ per square kilometre 203.15 current US$ per square kilometre 9.97 current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Cyprus or Namibia?
Namibia, at 319.17 current US$ per square kilometre against 283.96 current US$ per square kilometre in Cyprus as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Cyprus and Namibia?
35.21 current US$ per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Namibia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Cyprus and Namibia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Cyprus ranks 71st and Namibia ranks 70th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/namibia/">Cyprus vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.