Croatia vs Rwanda: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Croatia
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Rwanda
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Croatia rank
93rd
Rwanda rank
93rd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Croatia
  • Rwanda
0200400600800197019952021

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 93rd and Rwanda ranks 93rd of 216 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0857 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4063 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3206 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 0.0005 current US$ per square kilometre 40.93 current US$ per square kilometre 40.93 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 0.1162 current US$ per square kilometre 163.6 current US$ per square kilometre 163.49 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Croatia or Rwanda?
Croatia, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Croatia and Rwanda?
0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Rwanda?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Croatia and Rwanda rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Croatia ranks 93rd and Rwanda ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Rwanda: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/croatia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/croatia/rwanda/">Croatia vs Rwanda: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.